By Thomas J. Mueller, Christopher S. Allen, William K. Blake, Robert P. Dougherty, Denis Lynch, Paul T. Soderman, James R. Underbrink
ISBN-10: 3642075142
ISBN-13: 9783642075148
ISBN-10: 3662050587
ISBN-13: 9783662050583
The aim of aeroacoustic measurements is to supply a foundation for assessing mechanisms of noise iteration, and to boost tools of decreasing noise to extra appropriate degrees. even if, the measurements themselves are complicated, and require a deep knowing of the experimental facility applied (such as a wind tunnel), dimension instrumentation, and knowledge research suggestions.
In this quantity fresh advances within the size and realizing of aerodynamically generated sound are awarded through leaders within the improvement of recent thoughts during this box. either simple and utilized difficulties are coated in detail.
Read Online or Download Aeroacoustic Measurements PDF
Similar measurements books
Download PDF by Claus Grupen: Grundkurs Strahlenschutz: Praxiswissen für den Umgang mit
Das Buch bietet eine sehr praktisch ausgerichtete Einführung in die Probleme des Strahlenschutzes, seine physikalischen Grundlagen – wie die Wechselwirkung ionisierender Strahlung mit Materie – die biologische Strahlenwirkung, die Quellen der Strahlenbelastung aus unserer Umwelt, die Messmethoden im Strahlenschutz (Dosimetrie) und die praktische Wahrnehmung des Strahlenschutzes.
Download PDF by Alan S Morris: Measurement and Instrumentation. Theory and Application
Size and Instrumentation introduces undergraduate engineering scholars to the dimension ideas and the diversity of sensors and tools which are used for measuring actual variables. in accordance with Morriss dimension and Instrumentation rules, this fresh textual content has been absolutely up-to-date with assurance of the most recent advancements in such dimension applied sciences as clever sensors, clever tools, microsensors, electronic recorders and screens and interfaces.
Designing Quantitative Experiments: Prediction Analysis - download pdf or read online
The tactic of Prediction research is acceptable for someone drawn to designing a quantitative test. The layout part of an test should be damaged down into challenge established layout questions (like the kind of gear to take advantage of and the experimental setup) and accepted questions (like the variety of information issues required, variety of values for the autonomous variables and dimension accuracy).
- A Handbook of Radioactivity Measurements Procedures NCRP Reports 58
- Detection and disposal of improvised explosives
- Measure Theory and Functional Analysis
- Atmospheric Measurements during POPCORN — Characterisation of the Photochemistry over a Rural Area
- High Time Resolution Astrophysics
Additional resources for Aeroacoustic Measurements
Example text
20 wind tlUUlC data + . . . . . . . . . . . . +:.......................... -\ +. \: . 95 -30+-------~----~-+--+-+-~~~~----~~ 1 10 5 microphone distance fj·01D source, m 20 Fig. 18. Sound decay interference envelopes computed for a 1 kHz tone emitted in a 12-m high test section. Multiple envelopes are shown for various values of surface sound absorption coefficients between 0 (hard wall) and 1 (perfectly absorbent). Atmospheric conditions: 21°C, 56% relative humidity. 0048 dB/m.
This is why most aero acoustic work is done in anechoic or open test sections or accomplished in hard-walled facilities by use of phased microphone arrays that can avoid the reverberant sound. Reflections in a Semi-Anechoic Environment Reflections from the test environment can spoil any acoustic measurement. Interference between direct and reflected waves from a nozzle or collector (open jet) or walls (closed jet) or test apparatus (any wind tunnel) corrupt the sound field. Although design of anechoic facilities is beyond the scope of this chapter, there are steps a researcher can take to evaluate the acoustic quality of the test environment and estimate the level of interference from acoustic reflections.
At 60 kHz and below, the directivity effect is less than 5 dB. Above 60 kHz, the directivity effect is as much as 8 dB. Since a desired accuracy of ± 1 dB is typical, the effect of forebody directivity on microphone response is important. The azimuthal directional response of a forebody, i. , directivity about the microphone long axis is more uniform than the longitudinal response below 90 kHz. However, the azimuthal directivity effect can be significant at some frequencies because of variations in forebody screen construction.
Aeroacoustic Measurements by Thomas J. Mueller, Christopher S. Allen, William K. Blake, Robert P. Dougherty, Denis Lynch, Paul T. Soderman, James R. Underbrink
by Richard
4.2